Latency-aware routing.
Standard BGP picks the path with the fewest autonomous systems. That metric ignores geography, peering capacity, congestion, packet loss, and everything else that actually determines latency. We route on measured performance instead.
Why BGP alone isn't enough
Geographic distance
A 2-hop path can cross an ocean.
Peering capacity
A "short" path can be congested.
Packet loss, jitter, and latency variance
Intra-AS transit length
A single big AS can add 40+ ms.
Route leaks and hijacks
BGP default vs 101 Bits
How the two approaches compare on metrics that matter.
What we do
Dense peering
Direct PNIs with hyperscalers and Tier-1 transits.
IXP presence
Active at major internet exchanges.
Latency-aware overlay
Continuous probing, re-select in seconds.
Segment routing
Deterministic intra-backbone paths.
RPKI + MANRS
Validate origins, sign routes.
Published looking glass
Anyone can query our routing table.
What it means in practice
Median latency to major clouds
Measurably lower.
P95/P99 tail latency
Materially lower.
Fewer TCP retransmits
Faster TLS handshakes.
Predictable jitter
On VoIP and real-time media.
Ask us anything.
An architect — not a sales rep — will answer within one business day.